Past Legislation

Past Legislation

HB 530

House Bill 530 may be found at:
Bill Information | Direct Link to Bill Text
Impact: Cyber Charter Schools
Prime Sponsor: Representative Mike Reese
http://www.repreese.com

Summary:

  • PA HB 530 is designed to address perceived needs in the PA Charter School Law.  It is being driven by the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials whose agenda is to save money for school districts by cutting funding for Charter Schools.
  • This bill uniquely attacks Cyber Charter Schools and does not address other inequities.  It assumes that Cyber Charter Schools do not deserve the same amount of funding for their students as other traditional public schools or as other PA Charter Schools.
  • The cuts to Cyber Charter Schools across the board would be 5%, but could be as much as 8% from Philadelphia students and as much as 15% from Chester students.
  • This bill also establishes a funding commission that could do great damage to PA Charter Schools because the members are all appointed by elected politicians and their appointed representatives.

A summary of the bill may be found at: SUMMARY of HB 530
A more detailed summary may be retrieved by request from: Detailed Summary of HB 530

In essence, it would remove funding for Cyber Charter Schools this year alone by 8-10% and would remove as much as 20% in years to followSee a specific breakdown of how HB 530 would affect Charter Schools: Ten Items of Concern

HB 618

House Bill 618 may be found at:
Bill Information | Direct Link to Bill Text
Impact: Cyber Charter schools
Prime Sponsor: Representative Joe Emrick
http://www.repemrick.com/

Summary:  

  • PA HB 618 is designed to remove what is called a “double dip” in the funding of the Cyber-Charter-School pensions. Cyber Charter Schools currently receive 100% of the pension costs from the local district, and the state reimburses Cyber Charter Schools 50%, as well.
  • If passed, HB 618 will cut the 100% contribution made by the district to Cyber Charters, leaving only the 50% reimbursement from the state intact.
  • This bill punishes Cyber Charter Schools and does not address any other inequities.
  • It would leave Cyber-Charter-School employee pensions underfunded and flips the cyber “dip and a half” in favor of the local districts

In essence, it would remove funding for Cyber Charter Schools this year by 8-10% and would remove as much as 20% in subsequent years.
See the HB 618 Voting Record here: Voting Record for HB 618

Senate Bill 1085

Senate Bill 1085 may be found here:
Bill Information

The cuts in funding for Cyber Charter Schools can be found on pages 67-68 – Section 20. The co-sponsors are found at the top of page 1.

____________________________

Senate Bill 1085 attempts to provide some help to Charter Schools but cuts the funding for Charter Schools by 8-10% by [1] reducing the Pennsylvania State Employee Retirement System reimbursement to Charter Schools from the state by 3-5% and [2] cutting Cyber Charter Schools an additional 5%.

The first cut ([1] above) has been described as fixing a “double dip” – a payment from the school districts and an additional payment from the state for School Employee Retirement Plans.  There are other inequities within the funding formula that harms PA Charter (and Cyber Charter) Schools, like transportation, federal funds, and building reimbursements.  The only two changes proposed within this bill are two that harm Charter Schools.

Within the bill is a proposed “funding commission” that could provide an extensive analysis of the funding process for Charter and Cyber Charter schools.  Any changes to the funding formula thereafter should wait for the funding commission’s report.

The second cut ([2] above) for PA Cyber Charter Schools of 5% is arbitrary and based solely on the political pressures coming from home school districts to deplete their Cyber Charter Schools.  Because Cyber Charter Schools currently serve only 2% of the state’s 1.8 million students, the savings to the home school district will be .02% (two-tenths of one percent) of their school district budget.  However, the proposed hit to Cyber Charter Schools’ funding will be 5%.

The motivation for this cut is not to provide much-needed money for the home district but is an attempt to further punish Cyber Charter Schools.  Currently, Cyber Charters receive only 70% of the home districts’ cost for their student that chooses to attend a Cyber School instead.  These two additional cuts would cause Cyber Charter Schools to be the least-funded schools in the state.

The reason behind these cuts is that Cyber Charter Schools can function on less money, therefore they do not need as much.  If this were true, home school districts would have created dozens of Cyber Charter Schools enrolling tens of thousands of students more cheaply.  Home school districts cannot do this.  In fact, one such Cyber Charter School that was run by a Pennsylvania School District attempted such but had to close its doors in September 2013 after losing students over several previous years.

The other argument to cut funding for Charter Schools and cut additional funding for Cyber Charter Schools is that

  1. More than one top charter leader is under investigation for various crimes against the state.
  2. Four Cyber Charter Schools have given up their charter(s) and have closed.
  3. Various Charter-School-Management Companies provide leadership and services to Charter Schools and make a profit from their efforts.

There are currently more than 34,000 students enrolled in 15 Cyber Charter Schools.  It is wrong to punish these students based on the potential misconduct of a few.  That investigations are taking place and that 4 Cyber Charter Schools have shut down for various reasons over the last 12 years prove the system works.  Charter Schools are designed to provide numerous opportunities to create new models.  Those models that fail should be closed down.  This is in direct contrast to the current system that continues to support failing schools and provide more resources to under-performing schools.  In addition, various Charter-School-Management Companies have come and gone.  Institutions that serve positive purpose and prove positive success should be encouraged to grow.  Giving them a financial incentive to succeed is the engine that fuels an economy.

The reasons being used to reduce Charter and Cyber Charter schools of their resources are, in fact, the very reasons that these progressive and successful schools should be given more resources.

For these reasons, please contact your PA State Senator, State Representative, and Governor Wolf to let them know that cutting funding for Charter and Cyber Charter Schools is unfair and prejudiced.